Whats wrong with Kroger? Do they really think that people on Pinterest want to watch their flittering flashing obnoxious adds, like stupid neon idiot flashing lights. Whats wrong with Pinterest that they dont stop that kind of rediculous Kroger advertising aimed at IQ less than 20. Is money worth losing integrity on both sides?
For 36 years+ I have had pink impatiens flowers in my yard, first blooms appearing right around the first of July. They were here when I bought the house and the previous owner pointed out these tiny sprouts and said to me that these are “reseeding impatiens”. They come in various shades of pink from a deep magenta to a pale baby pink.
Over the years I have noticed that weather plays a huge part in whether these impatiens come back in droves or whether they are sparce. At some point a few years ago I began collecting seeds thinking that perhaps in a warm december that the seeds would sprout and then succumb to the freezes in January.
The flowers themselves are the only flower in my yard which attracts migrating humming birds and the bees and bumble bees dont seem to pay them much attention. From August onward the seed pods form (which are terriffic examples of genetic engineering), and as they mature into little “impatiens-seed grenades” they pop with huge vigor spreading their 50-100+ seeds (within each pod) out onto the ground. This year I decided to count the seeds (so to speak) and there are about 222 seeds in each 0.15g. (I will update with total seeds collected later in the fall).
I have noticed that there are differences in seed-producing vigor with the very pale pink impatiens having fewer seeds and smaller seed pods, and lighter color seeds than the very dark impatiens do. The biggest pods seem to be on the medium pink variety. I collect them all, every color. I have sorted seeds by color in the past, but when I throw the seeds to the ground in early May it seems not to make much difference how I have sorted the colors and what color impatiens flowers spring forth.
Not the prettiest, or showiest variety of impatiens, just plain and simple, but I enjoy them, their color, and the fact that they have persisted in my yard (sometimes with my help), for decades.
Images below show flowers with mature and immature pods, and pods I have collected (immature pods are small, narrow, and dont have a translucency, and dont look “pregnant”), and the seeds are shown collected in the last image.
missed opportunity for solutions
come from overzealous debunking
SP-D and bovine conglutinin hydrophilicity plots by AA and by nm. Published images of bovine conglutinin (Strang et al, ) were subjected to gaussian blur then used to plot where the N and the CRD domains were found. His measurements didn’t include the neck regions and it seemed pretty clear that there was such a peak visible in his images.
Human SP-D hydrophilicity plots (made with the same app by NovoPro where hydrophobic AA are causing the “peaks themselves so better named a hydrophobicity plot), and bovine coglutinin were compared both by the AA sequence and nm dimensions. Strangs images of negatively stained molecules he considered slightly less in length than shadowed images, he did not have AFM images and the my plot comparison is with SP-D is AFM.
Hydrophilicity plot of conglutinin show a different number of peaks along the collagen-like domain…. but still the plot maintains a great similarity to the SP-D. A previous post (here) does plot bovine SP-D in comparison to human SP-D, as well as three other species. These plots are by AA, and I will adjust them to nm plots next. Image below is a crop of the image above and rotated to horizontal. The nm bar does not exist on Strangs images therefore I have estimated this from his description.
Purpose: to determine whether the hydrophilicity plots have been, will be helpful in discerning structure and function of surfactant protein D. Looks like conglutin matches up pretty much. So I am inclined to give them nm values that are predicted by SP-D.
It is possible that a larger CRD region is actually present (as i would have predicted from Strangs image, however i used his dimensions to create the color version above, and the hydrophilicity-by-nm plot just above that.
One interesting point is that Strang mentions different dimensions when using different TEM techniques — and it seems from his imags and comparisons with the CRD region in AFM images that the AFM blends the three CRD regions into a bigger “glob” than the negative staining and shadowing. This may be the reason that the CRD in is smaller than found in the SP-D AFM images. The way to find out of course is to have the each molecule treated in the exact same way.
Just another note, it looks like the N term junction of the shadowed image might actually show structure not seen routinely in AFM images.
Purpose here: to see whether the collagen-like domain, which has much similarity to the SP-D collagen like domain, has the regular “peaks” along its length like SP-D.
Hydrophilicity (hydrophobicity) plots of SP-D of five species (human, macaque, rat, mouse, and bovine) are convincingly similar to each other (as are their sequence comparisons) to confirm that a pattern was present in the hydrophilicity of some areas of the collagen-like domain. This led me to see whether the as yet unpublished 4 additional grayscale peaks in an SP-D trimer (1 distal to the N term peak, three distal to the collagen-like domain (plotted in a direction with N term peak on the left) were “in line” with the peaks in the hydrophilicity plots. Know grayscale peaks for SP-D are — N term, glycosylation peak, CRD peaks — identified in published AFM images (Arroyo et al, 2018).
Species hydrophilicity plots of SP-D are below and a comparison of human hydrophilicity plots, and grayscale plots from AFM Images just for human is HERE.
Trying to make
Someone happy. It
Does not matter if
a harbor café
our bikes are taken.
We talk across
A straw wrapped
Chianti bottle. Love
Multiplies in cool
Air from a door
To their seabed,
We’re not sure
How to fit in
the future as
More than needed
Adorns the moves
To make someone
The hydrophilicity plot(s) for SP-D from 5 species (human, macaque, mouse, rat, bovine) were found using NCBI aa sequences (whoe protein and regions) and an app from NovoPro. (The plots for SP-D were so similar I in terms of the values along the collagen-like domain that it seemed unnecessary to do more – find these plots HERE). They are shown below, each with the species name and the number of aa is on the x axis. The peak widths that have been plotted for SP-D in previous posts are shown, as well as the “half” N term width. The number of aa per domain does not correlate with the number of nm for the peaks, particularly for the folded CRD vs the linear collagen-like-doman. In addition, because of the “hinge” like link between the coiled coil neck domain and the CRD domain, the CRD portions of the molecule can lie back covering a lot of (if not all of) the neck domain, resulting in non-detection of the neck peak in over half the plots.
Using the length (in nm) of a trimer determined by many many plots, 73nm is the trimer length that I will use.
This works out really well in my opinion, except for the fact that on SFTPD orthologs – NCBI there is a small string of aa that are not part of N and not part of the collagen-like domain, and it fits nicely with a tiny peak found at the valley of the N term peak just before the glycosylation peak. Graphic below. Top plot by aa only, bottom plot shown adjusted for now many nm the peak actually shows on AFM images. Black arrows point to peaks which consistently appear in grayscale plots, which have not yet really been published. Peaks without arrows have been described.
An original hydrophilicity plot (C-J-Guo et al, PLoS Biol. 2008 Nov; 6(11): e266, their Fig. 1 ) shown here startled me with its similarity to the grayscale plots that seem to be pretty well established for trimers (and the trimer portion of hexamers and dodecamers) of SP-D. The plot seemed to me to be divided into into three distinct peak patterns, one where the N term domain is located (in this case on the right as a very tall peak), a stretch of four large peaks regularly spaced with deep valleys (the collagen-like-domain and with the glycosylation site — the first peak to the right of the N term peak — which they did not identify), and then a dozen irregular low peaks in a stretch reaching the large irregular area where the CRD domain is. In the legend by Guo et al, they do mention that the dimensions of their 3D models have been changed (shortened collagen-like-domain) for “esthetic” purposes (which for me is an error in judgement and means looking at that part of the figure allows for confusion).
The label above this original figure that names these four domains and shows their approximate length in terms of aa sequence.
One issue with this depiction is that it does not take into consideration the considerable folding that occurs in the CRD domain. This causes the CRD domain part of the hydrophilicity plot to be disproportionately long and the proportion of the straight collagen like domain is disproportionately short. The actual AFM images of SP-D these domains are not that close in nm of length.
But the possibility of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity (peaks being hydrophobic AA) being important in the peaks that appear in AFM images was sufficiently similar to compare the grayscale plots with the hydrophilicity plot directly. There is only one plot here (meaning there is going to be variation in the plots from various trimers and thus is to be seen as just an n of 1, unlike the plots of AFM images, but like the grayscale plots, a definite pattern is recognizable).
The main problem in comparing the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity plot and the grayscale plots is that the latter is measured in nm and the former is measured in amino acid residues. This means the folding and twisting of the carbohydrate recognition domain would be much longer relative to the the CRD domain which is very convoluted so the whole molecule in the hydrophilicity plots need to be adjusted for nm in the grayscale plots, thereby making a good match for peaks difficult. ( In the hydrophilicity plot since it is measured in amino acids the CRD domain plot would be disproportionately long because it does NOT show its typical folding, and the collagen-like-domain (which is basically straight) would appear to be relatively short.)
It would be an easy task to just go adjust the hydrophilicity plot which shows hydrophobic AA as peaks, to “my liking”, which is sort of what I did quickly in the image below. It would be more accurate (and a better fit) if I actually stretched and shrunk the hydrophilicity plot by the actual number of amino acids in each domain, then translated that into nm. Have not done this yet, but here is the jist of what I am pretty sure will show up. Y in the thin bar for the x axis legend at the bottom of the figure is the glycosylation site, which does correspond to the green peak (glycosylation peak) in the AFM plots.
I keep my bottle,
my pauli girl
On ice, staying cold
Between each sip.
I keep my words
On my lips
I don’t keep my
She keeps me
living light on
I keep my thoughts
Might like birds
Coming on them
In the brush,
I keep my hand
On the throttle
Air today that’s